Questions

Image sickness is a state of being where one's actions have their impetus from habitual unconscious attention to images. Mental images of the environment are treated as real when in fact they are illusions.
Images are static and reality is ever changing.
Any image is merely a fragment of the whole and should never be believed to be the whole.

Any movement away from what is real is a dissipation of energy. Attention to images therefore dissipates ones energy. Conscious visualization as a movement of creation relies on efficient use of ones energy.

What is the origin of image sickness? To believe the symbol is the thing. To believe images are real.

Where is the root of image sickness in one's psyche?

How does image sickness manifest?

Why do we have beliefs at all?

When are images useful?
communication

What is the source of order in a culture?

Do individuals organize themselves with symbols or because of symbols?

Are there classes of image sets which fragment society?

Is there a class of people who are aware of the "physics" of symbols?

Are symbols a prerequisite for organization?

Is it possible for a society to organize without communication of symbols?

Are security and the unknown mutually exclusive?

There are benefits to images: dreams, creativity, invention. What is the source of innovation?

Is it possible to survive and prosper without attention to images?

Is it necessary to communicate to cooperate?

Does a power structure depend on beliefs?

How to be awake and alert without images?
It is the balanced natural state...the foundational state...calculated tension produces the illusion of fragmentation....to be aware of an image is to ignore everything else. The tension is the effort of blocking out all the rest?

Is focus of the mind on one fragment of reality the only way or do we simultaneously process all in-formations?

Is it necessary to communicate to ourselves? Don't we sense what is all the time?
The constant stream of thought chatter. Why?

If we weren't talking to ourselves what would we be doing?

Is the reason we have to make decisions because of perception or projection of images?

Is the concept 'choice' a cultural artifact?

How do we decide what we want (lack)?

Do tools and artifacts always arise from some individual's images?
It seems to me that the physical substance is a wonderful medium for storing images. Better in substance than in the mind. Persistence. Also requires substantial energy to store an image physically so that naturally selects between images.

What is the most important strategic artifact in the world today?

Is the reason we don't often have memories of being a baby and young child because at the time we had not learned the image structure which we use to communicate to ourselves and others?

Isn't government just a set of images arbitrarily held by individuals?

Seriously, why does everyone talk to themselves in their head? You know thinking thinking thinking. Seems absurd once you look at it, I mean really don't you think its weird when someone talks out loud to themselves too much? What's the difference? Why do we need to communicate with ourselves? Are we not sensing reality without the communication, the thoughts?

We all must believe that thinking has some impact on the environment. Is everybody wrong?

Doesn't responsibility mean "having the ability to respond" instead of duty to an ideal, person, or group?

Can you watch an image form in your mind?

If there was no problem or crisis sensed would we need to project images?